|
Posted on 01.25.12 by Danny Glover @ 11:30 am
We’ve been down this road before on this blog — twice, in fact. Apparently road-painting crews (and our “home-shcooled” son) have trouble spelling the word “school correctly. The latest example, as reported by Fox News:
Filed under: Government and Grammar and Human Interest and Just For Laughs and Photography Comments: None |
|
Posted on 01.04.12 by Danny Glover @ 5:35 pm
When I decided to become a journalist, I imagined I’d be working in an atmosphere much closer to this one than the one I’ve known for the past 20 years: The tools for producing and distributing journalism in the information age are much better than those of yesteryear, but I do long for the days of the “rewrite man” and copy editors. They were the protectors of the art of great writing — a mostly lost art in today’s era of blogs, tweets and text messages, where too many journalists think good grammar and consistent style are antiquated. Filed under: Grammar and History and Media and Social Media and Video Comments: None |
|
Posted on 10.19.11 by Danny Glover @ 1:14 pm
I know the economy is bad, but is it so bad that people would be willing to consider a job where one of the skills required is this:
I can see why someone who is willing to work indecently wouldn’t want much direct supervision. The job also requires “overnight travel” and a willingness to “embrace diversity.” One laughable error in word choice makes the ad sound like something from an adult publication, but it’s actually a listing for … a food-safety specialist in Northern Virginia/Maryland. No pole-dancing required. My guess is that the ad meant to say the employee “must be able to work independently.” Instead, we see what happens when all of the copy editors are downsized. Filed under: 1980s and Adoption and Books and Business and Grammar and Just For Laughs and Media Comments: None |
|
Posted on 10.11.11 by Danny Glover @ 10:00 pm
Spot-checking the text messages of young children can be great entertainment for parents — or as the shcool kids say, LOL!!! On the off chance that this was just a typo, we asked our 12-year-old son after seeing the message how to spell “school.” He spelled it verbally just the way he spelled it in the text to his friend. Clearly we need to schedule a remedial spelling class at the Glover Home School. And in case you’re wondering, yes, he knows we check his text messages randomly. It was a condition for us getting him a phone at such a young age — an open approach that I recommend for all parents. Anthony also knew I was going to post this snapshot of his mobile screen. He’s hoping it will make him famous all over the Internet. Boys! The sad thing is that now I’ll no longer be able to poke fun at public schools for this amusing error because our “home shcooled” son is guilty of it as well. Filed under: Grammar and Home Schooling and Just For Laughs and Parenting and Technology Comments: None |
|
Posted on 08.25.10 by Danny Glover @ 10:39 pm
Amy Hinds, a teacher in Missouri, the author of the blog Living Single in Small-Town America, and a talented photographer, fancies herself a teacher. But by my reading of her latest blog entry, “Really … I Don’t Hate Rednecks,” she has much to learn, too. It’s clear from the title and lighthearted tone of of Hinds’ essay that she’s not as hostile as most people who make a sport of mocking rednecks these days. But she has an elitist streak that is blinding her to who we rednecks really are. A stubborn embrace of the Confederate flag does not a redneck make. Neither are sexism nor a contempt for English class the exclusive domain of rednecks. Plenty of highly educated men are chauvinist pigs who can’t write or speak coherently, and whose idea of a good book is the Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue. Ironically, Hinds plans to use her own redneck past to better connect with her students:
It’s a smart move on her part. Hopefully she’ll learn as much about rednecks this year as they learn from her. It sounds like they all need a good education. Filed under: Grammar and Hatin' On Rednecks and People and Rednecks Comments: None |
|
Posted on 03.05.10 by Danny Glover @ 7:57 pm
We think it’s important to teach our children good grammar during the elementary and secondary education years so they don’t look foolish while using bad grammar to protest during their college years. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 02.26.10 by Danny Glover @ 7:43 pm
So our public schools are stuffing kids full of sugar- and fat-laced snacks but apparently not teaching them capitalization, punctuation and other basic rules of grammar. Parents might as well send their kids to a candy store for classes — which may be their best chance for employment if they don’t start learning how to write. It’s enough to make an enlightened redneck journalist like me scream. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Culture and Food and Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 11.05.09 by Danny Glover @ 9:05 pm
That is especially true of blogs like this one. Most of us bloggers post our copy online without a second glance, in part because of our rush to be first with the news and in part because copy editing can be a tedious chore. The end result is copy that often is grammatically incorrect, stylistically weak and plagued by typos. We bloggers need good copy editors — or we need to be our own copy editors. Alas, the way of the blog appears to be the way of print media in the information age, too. From Editors Weblog:
That commentary came at the end of a piece about copy errors so abundant in a Washington Post sports story that some readers demanded a full refund for the day’s paper. “There is no excuse for such a shoddy product,” one reader wrote. “It’s completely unprofessional.” Indeed it is. The Internet has helped improve the quality of reporting in many cases and certainly has added perspective to today’s journalism that has been sorely lacking in news outlets dominated by liberals. But at the same time the Web has hurt the quality of writing. Readers, many of whom long ago stopped caring about good grammar in their personal communications, want the news now and care less whether the copy is clean. And reporters, long a grammatically challenged bunch, are happy to deliver substance inside a flawed package. Reader, writer and publisher alike seem to have decided that because you can’t judge a book by its cover, it’s OK to just slap a crappy cover on the book. That’s a shame. Copy editors are the unsung heroes of America’s newsrooms. They are master craftsmen of the written word, and they have saved many a writer (including this one) from embarrassing moments. Copy editing is one aspect of old media that needs to be a carryover in this new media era. Filed under: Grammar and Media and Technology Comments: 1 Comment |









