|
Posted on 03.05.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 7:57 pm
We think it’s important to teach our children good grammar during the elementary and secondary education years so they don’t look foolish while using bad grammar to protest during their college years. Filed under: Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 02.26.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 7:43 pm
So our public schools are stuffing kids full of sugar- and fat-laced snacks but apparently not teaching them capitalization, punctuation and other basic rules of grammar. Parents might as well send their kids to a candy store for classes — which may be their best chance for employment if they don’t start learning how to write. It’s enough to make an enlightened redneck journalist like me scream. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Culture and Food and Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 12.11.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:45 am
We don’t want our children put on a government-approved diet of “spent hens” and other menu items that don’t even pass muster with the fast-food industry. The good news is that some unlucky members of Congress and their aides will be served a heaping helping of school lunches one day next week — ironically enough because the Agriculture Department thinks it is doing a great job feeding America’s schoolchildren. We’ll keep serving our kids lunches from Costco. The food there is a safer health bet. Filed under: Food and Government and Parenting and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 12.07.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 4:31 pm
We don’t want our children subjected to the kinds of perversion embraced by education “leaders” like Kevin Jennings, head of the Education Department’s Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools and founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Jennings is under fire for the reading list that the “education network” he built recommends to schools. It is full of vile portrayals of explicit sexual acts, both visual and textual. If you want the proof, it’s at Gateway Pundit. But be forewarned that it is repulsive, X-rated content. As Michelle Malkin says, “Make sure you have an empty stomach before you read.” If this is the Obama administration’s idea of quality education, everyone should start teaching their children at home immediately. UPDATED to add this related Day By Day cartoon, homeschooling reference included: (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 2 Comments |
|
Posted on 10.26.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:41 pm
We don’t want some secretary on an abusive power trip to duct tape one of our children because he or she is misbehaving. And trust me, we have one child for whom that fate would be a distinct possibility if duct-taping were the norm. If the mother’s account of what happened after she heard of the incident is true, the most infuriating aspect of the story is that the school’s principal all but ignored the mother’s complaint. That is a frequent problem in public schools. Administrators are quick to defend their officials and employees for behavior that obviously crosses lines of decency. Parents are better off teaching their kids at home than fighting against the protect-our-own syndrome infecting American schools today. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Parenting and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 10.14.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:14 pm
We don’t want our son, a former Cub Scout, to be threatened with a 45-day suspension for bringing to school a combination folding knife, fork and spoon so he can eat his lunch. Zero-tolerance policies and the brainless bureaucrats who invented them are not an issue in the Glover Home School. Anthony is welcome to bring his Swiss Army to school any day of the week. It could come in handy for science and perhaps other classes. Thankfully, the school board in Delaware overturned officials who decided 6-year-old Zachary Christie needed to have the Book of Stupid Laws thrown at him for accidentally violating a policy that lacks common sense. Unfortunately, zero-tolerance policies are still being enforced across the country. In case you’ve forgotten, Lesson #21 is similar to Lesson #12 — no strip searches in the Glover Home School to look for pain killers — which was also the result of a zero-tolerance policy. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Government and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 09.23.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:50 pm
We don’t want our children being forced to watch one-sided presentations of policy debates while in anatomy class:
Anatomy class is supposed to be about dissecting earthworms and frogs, not dissecting the president’s half-truths about health care in America. Civics class is the appropriate forum for discussing presidential speeches — and if education rather than indoctrination is the goal, then both sides should be aired. Republicans delivered a response to Obama the same night of his speech to Congress. One of them didn’t even wait until it was over. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 09.21.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:04 pm
People who believe spanking is “child abuse” make no sense when they try to defend that view. Witness Joy Behar on CNN: Did you catch the inconsistency? To justify her biblically incorrect argument that all spanking is child abuse, Behar played the emotionally charged, how-dare-you-spank-a-baby trump card: “Now what could a 1-year-old possibly do to deserve being spanked?” The implication is that children are too young to ever do anything worthy of “bruising physically or psychologically.” But in the next breath, she perverted the famous Rene Descartes quote “I think; therefore, I am” to make a conflicting point about parent-child communication. She said parents need to “think” before they spank and lift their minds rather than their hands. Come again? A 1-year-old is too young to be spanked but can “think” on the same level as Descartes? He or she can intellectually learn right from wrong? Talk about a disconnect from reality. It’s frightening to think that Behar used to be a school teacher. Her radical views on spanking are consistent, in a wacky way, with her wild accusation that home-schooled children are “demented.” But that just means you can add Joy Behar to the list of reasons why we home-school. As for discipline in the home, I’ll heed God’s Word rather than the rantings of an unhinged talk-show host. The key is not to shun discipline altogether but to do it only when necessary, only out of love and never in haste. Filed under: Culture and Home Schooling and Parenting and Religion and Why We Home-School Comments: 2 Comments |
|
Posted on 09.02.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:56 pm
We don’t want our children to be part of a captive national audience for a self-serving political speech — by President Obama or any politician. I’m glad to see at least one school principal has the sense to let parents shield their kids from that kind of propaganda, but parents shouldn’t have to opt their children out of an event where, until hours ago, they were going to be asked to “write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.” Lest you think this is an isolated lapse of good judgment, read Michelle Malkin’s latest column, which documents “the activist tradition of government schools” in great detail. Here’s a taste of it:
That’s why “Mommy” is also “Mrs. Glover” to the three impressionable children in our home. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 4 Comments |
|
Posted on 05.19.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:23 am
We don’t want our children being forced to endure politically correct lessons that equate moral opposition to homosexuality with “homophobia” — or being forced to endure any sex education in kindergarten. Heed the wisdom of Pundette over at Hot Air: “If parents are serious about passing their values on to their children, they might want to consider whether they’re undermining their own cause by sending them to public schools.” (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Religion and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 05.05.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 8:51 am
We don’t want our children to be at the mercy of bureaucrats who make rules and decisions based on politics or their own whims rather than the best educational interests of our children. If Timothy and Michelle Wood are smart, they will pull their son, Alex, out of the Howard County school system in Maryland and teach him themselves. That’s the best way to beat a system more wedded to misguided rules than to placing children in the best schools close to home. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Government and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 03.11.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 2:28 pm
We want our children to learn that success is a blessing that comes from hard work. It’s called merit. Unfortunately, too many teachers in public schools subscribe to the twisted thinking of Harvard University professor Lani Guinier that, “We need to redefine merit.” Filed under: Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 02.19.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 4:33 pm
We don’t want our children educated in a system that has bred a generation of students who expect A’s for effort. Granted the story I linked to is about college students, and the professors quoted in the story scoff at their students’ expectations. But those expectations are a product of the formative educational years. Good grades are a reward for getting it right, not for getting it wrong but trying really hard. But kids these days think they’re entitled to everything, including high grades for mediocre work. That’s not the way it works in the Glover Home School. Our kids get A’s when they get most, if not all, of the answers right — and we use the tougher grading scale that educators used in my day, meaning that scores of 93 to 100 get you an A and anything below 70 is an F. The next generation of Glovers will have to wait until they get to college for the easier grading scale, where the B doesn’t kick in until 89 and students can pass with a score as low as 60. If it was good enough for me in redneck West Virginia, it’s good enough for my son and daughters. P.S. Yes, I used the phrase “kids these days,” so I’m now officially old. Filed under: Culture and West Virginia and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 01.29.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 5:01 pm
Because we want to teach our children to show their patriotism by pledging allegiance to the flag and the country, not to the president. More importantly, we want to teach our children to pledge allegiance to God before country. As part of their Classical Conversations home-schooling session each week, they join their classmates in reciting not only the “Pledge Of Allegiance” but also this pledge to the Bible: I pledge allegiance to the Bible,
God’s Holy Word. I will make it a lamp unto my feet, A light unto my path. I will hide its words in my heart So that I might not sin against God. I hadn’t heard that saying until our kids joined Classical Conversations, but I wrote something similar several years ago when the debate over the phrase “under God” in the pledge was raging. I call it the “Prayer Of Allegiance”: Filed under: Family and Home Schooling and News & Politics and Religion and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 01.19.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:08 pm
We can teach our children about the amazing democratic significance of presidential inaugurations without having to adhere to some politically correct code of conduct. In fact, that’s precisely what we will do. Tomorrow’s agenda at the Glover Home School is all inauguration, all the time. We’ll watch the festivities on television with our three children (all but one of whom has seen an inauguration in person at very young ages), and my wife has other activities and lessons planned. They include:
To get in the mood tonight, we just watched a History Channel program on presidents who served in the era from 1825 to 1849. Now we’re watching a show about Air Force One. Filed under: Government and History and Home Schooling and People and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
| previous posts » |






