|
Posted on 08.11.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 6:32 pm
We want our children to learn how to spell “school” correctly: Future lessons: “2+2 = 5,” and “Barack Obama is the first president of the United States.” OK, this flub technically isn’t the school’s fault. But I’ll bet the road contractor who painted the sign got his fifth-grade education in public school. Plus remember, his bosses and officials at the nearby school let the error dry long enough for journalists to snap embarrassing pictures of it. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Human Interest and Just For Laughs and News & Politics and Photography and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 07.16.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 12:41 pm
Our children don’t need as “leaders” religiously correct busybodies who are determined to push all references to God, even those that are part of America’s government and culture. The key quote from this video: “So, this school district is arguing that Judeo-Christian views, as expressed in our nation’s history, are too offensive for students to view — but other religions, even anti-religion … OK.” (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: History and News & Politics and Religion and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 07.07.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:22 pm
We want our children to get an education without being subjected to all the stressful and counterproductive pressures of a system created by the government and run by bureaucrats. Watch the trailer for the documentary “Race to Nowhere: The Dark Side of America’s Achievement Culture” for a glimpse of what formal education has become: To be fair, part of me wonders, after watching the video, whether the bigger problem is that we have reared a generation of whiny kids who cry “Woe is me!” because they have to do homework to get ahead. But I also think this is a valid point:
Teaching done right will make children love to learn, and loving parents focused on educating just a few children can do the job better than most “trained” teachers in today’s schools. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Entertainment and News & Politics and Parenting and Video and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 06.28.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:19 pm
We don’t want our children “educated” in an environment where administrators encourage sexual promiscuity as early as elementary school by distributing condoms. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Culture and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 04.02.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 12:05 am
We want to teach our children reading, writing and arithmetic in a loving family atmosphere, not turn them over to an education bureaucracy that thinks “school-homing” is the way to go. What’s school-homing, you ask? Schools that dedicate as much or more time and resources to “extras” like social services and school-based clinics that offer reproductive health counseling and contraceptives, among other things. The Heritage Foundation makes the educational case against such nonsense in schools:
(Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Government and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 03.31.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 12:24 am
This one comes courtesy of fellow journalist/blogger Robert Stacy McCain, who explained in an interview at the blog Jumping In Pools why home is the school for his children:
(Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Government and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 03.05.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 7:57 pm
We think it’s important to teach our children good grammar during the elementary and secondary education years so they don’t look foolish while using bad grammar to protest during their college years. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 02.26.10 by K. Daniel Glover @ 7:43 pm
So our public schools are stuffing kids full of sugar- and fat-laced snacks but apparently not teaching them capitalization, punctuation and other basic rules of grammar. Parents might as well send their kids to a candy store for classes — which may be their best chance for employment if they don’t start learning how to write. It’s enough to make an enlightened redneck journalist like me scream. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Culture and Food and Grammar and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 1 Comment |
|
Posted on 12.11.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:45 am
We don’t want our children put on a government-approved diet of “spent hens” and other menu items that don’t even pass muster with the fast-food industry. The good news is that some unlucky members of Congress and their aides will be served a heaping helping of school lunches one day next week — ironically enough because the Agriculture Department thinks it is doing a great job feeding America’s schoolchildren. We’ll keep serving our kids lunches from Costco. The food there is a safer health bet. Filed under: Food and Government and Parenting and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 12.07.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 4:31 pm
We don’t want our children subjected to the kinds of perversion embraced by education “leaders” like Kevin Jennings, head of the Education Department’s Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools and founder of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network. Jennings is under fire for the reading list that the “education network” he built recommends to schools. It is full of vile portrayals of explicit sexual acts, both visual and textual. If you want the proof, it’s at Gateway Pundit. But be forewarned that it is repulsive, X-rated content. As Michelle Malkin says, “Make sure you have an empty stomach before you read.” If this is the Obama administration’s idea of quality education, everyone should start teaching their children at home immediately. UPDATED to add this related Day By Day cartoon, homeschooling reference included: (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 2 Comments |
|
Posted on 10.26.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:41 pm
We don’t want some secretary on an abusive power trip to duct tape one of our children because he or she is misbehaving. And trust me, we have one child for whom that fate would be a distinct possibility if duct-taping were the norm. If the mother’s account of what happened after she heard of the incident is true, the most infuriating aspect of the story is that the school’s principal all but ignored the mother’s complaint. That is a frequent problem in public schools. Administrators are quick to defend their officials and employees for behavior that obviously crosses lines of decency. Parents are better off teaching their kids at home than fighting against the protect-our-own syndrome infecting American schools today. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Parenting and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 10.14.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:14 pm
We don’t want our son, a former Cub Scout, to be threatened with a 45-day suspension for bringing to school a combination folding knife, fork and spoon so he can eat his lunch. Zero-tolerance policies and the brainless bureaucrats who invented them are not an issue in the Glover Home School. Anthony is welcome to bring his Swiss Army to school any day of the week. It could come in handy for science and perhaps other classes. Thankfully, the school board in Delaware overturned officials who decided 6-year-old Zachary Christie needed to have the Book of Stupid Laws thrown at him for accidentally violating a policy that lacks common sense. Unfortunately, zero-tolerance policies are still being enforced across the country. In case you’ve forgotten, Lesson #21 is similar to Lesson #12 — no strip searches in the Glover Home School to look for pain killers — which was also the result of a zero-tolerance policy. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: Government and News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 09.23.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 10:50 pm
We don’t want our children being forced to watch one-sided presentations of policy debates while in anatomy class:
Anatomy class is supposed to be about dissecting earthworms and frogs, not dissecting the president’s half-truths about health care in America. Civics class is the appropriate forum for discussing presidential speeches — and if education rather than indoctrination is the goal, then both sides should be aired. Republicans delivered a response to Obama the same night of his speech to Congress. One of them didn’t even wait until it was over. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: None |
|
Posted on 09.21.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:04 pm
People who believe spanking is “child abuse” make no sense when they try to defend that view. Witness Joy Behar on CNN: Did you catch the inconsistency? To justify her biblically incorrect argument that all spanking is child abuse, Behar played the emotionally charged, how-dare-you-spank-a-baby trump card: “Now what could a 1-year-old possibly do to deserve being spanked?” The implication is that children are too young to ever do anything worthy of “bruising physically or psychologically.” But in the next breath, she perverted the famous Rene Descartes quote “I think; therefore, I am” to make a conflicting point about parent-child communication. She said parents need to “think” before they spank and lift their minds rather than their hands. Come again? A 1-year-old is too young to be spanked but can “think” on the same level as Descartes? He or she can intellectually learn right from wrong? Talk about a disconnect from reality. It’s frightening to think that Behar used to be a school teacher. Her radical views on spanking are consistent, in a wacky way, with her wild accusation that home-schooled children are “demented.” But that just means you can add Joy Behar to the list of reasons why we home-school. As for discipline in the home, I’ll heed God’s Word rather than the rantings of an unhinged talk-show host. The key is not to shun discipline altogether but to do it only when necessary, only out of love and never in haste. Filed under: Culture and Home Schooling and Parenting and Religion and Why We Home-School Comments: 2 Comments |
|
Posted on 09.02.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:56 pm
We don’t want our children to be part of a captive national audience for a self-serving political speech — by President Obama or any politician. I’m glad to see at least one school principal has the sense to let parents shield their kids from that kind of propaganda, but parents shouldn’t have to opt their children out of an event where, until hours ago, they were going to be asked to “write letters to themselves about what they can do to help the president.” Lest you think this is an isolated lapse of good judgment, read Michelle Malkin’s latest column, which documents “the activist tradition of government schools” in great detail. Here’s a taste of it:
That’s why “Mommy” is also “Mrs. Glover” to the three impressionable children in our home. (Read previous “Why We Home-School” lessons.) Filed under: News & Politics and Why We Home-School Comments: 4 Comments |
| previous posts » |







