Heck Of A Job, Climate Alarmists
Posted on 11.26.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 4:19 pm

In the immediate aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, former President George W. Bush stood behind his emergency-response man, Michael Brown. “Brownie, you’re doing a heck of a job,” Bush said.

But Brown actually was doing a lousy job and resigned within days of the hurricane because of his poor management.

Four years later, the spirit of Bush lives in Barack Obama’s Environmental Protection Agency chief, Carol Browner. She offered her wholehearted endorsement to so-called climate scientists who for years, based on their own words, have been manipulating data, hiding it from the public, quashing dissent and blackballing anyone who dared not toe the environmental line.

“I’m sticking with the 2,500 scientists,” Browner said in confirming her faith in cooked numbers and “settled science.” “These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real.”

In other words: Heck of a job, climate alarmists. With the help of biased journalists like Andrew Revkin and his editors at The New York Times, we’ll have this “ClimateGate” scandal out of the news in no time. You just keep spinning, manipulating and hyping like you have been.

But the spin isn’t going to work for Browner any more than it worked for Brownie. This story, as E. Thomas McClanahan of the Kansas City Star says, is not going away anytime soon.

Even the climate alarmists now realize they can’t control the grassroots peer-review system of the new media era.

“Before the Internet — which has given ordinary people a way to fight back against the received wisdom of so-called ‘wise elites’ — they might have gotten away with it,” Lorrie Goldstein wrote in the Toronto Sun. “But not now, as knowledgeable climate bloggers are advancing the story and forcing the co-opted mainstream media to cover a scandal most would rather ignore.”

[Cross-posted to Accuracy In Media. Hat tip to Don Surber]


Filed under: Government and Media and News & Politics and People
Comments:

1 Comment »

  1. [...] a living in the scientific community, puts all of his faith in the peer-review process, whereby scientific researchers study each others’ data to make sure it is sound before publication in austere journals. [...]

    Pingback by The Enlightened Redneck » The Politics Of Peer Review Exposed — November 27, 2009 @ 4:54 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)



The Redneck Report


Featured Entries

Recent Entries

Archives
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
December 2007

Categories

Search
Blogroll

Blogs I Read

Enlightened Reads

My Other Blogs

Redneck Reads

Video Stops


Syndication
RSS 2.0
Comments RSS 2.0
WordPress

Social Networks
Copyright © 2010 Danny Glover. All rights reserved.
Site by Three Group