|
Posted on 11.05.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 9:05 pm
That is especially true of blogs like this one. Most of us bloggers post our copy online without a second glance, in part because of our rush to be first with the news and in part because copy editing can be a tedious chore. The end result is copy that often is grammatically incorrect, stylistically weak and plagued by typos. We bloggers need good copy editors — or we need to be our own copy editors. Alas, the way of the blog appears to be the way of print media in the information age, too. From Editors Weblog:
That commentary came at the end of a piece about copy errors so abundant in a Washington Post sports story that some readers demanded a full refund for the day’s paper. “There is no excuse for such a shoddy product,” one reader wrote. “It’s completely unprofessional.” Indeed it is. The Internet has helped improve the quality of reporting in many cases and certainly has added perspective to today’s journalism that has been sorely lacking in news outlets dominated by liberals. But at the same time the Web has hurt the quality of writing. Readers, many of whom long ago stopped caring about good grammar in their personal communications, want the news now and care less whether the copy is clean. And reporters, long a grammatically challenged bunch, are happy to deliver substance inside a flawed package. Reader, writer and publisher alike seem to have decided that because you can’t judge a book by its cover, it’s OK to just slap a crappy cover on the book. That’s a shame. Copy editors are the unsung heroes of America’s newsrooms. They are master craftsmen of the written word, and they have saved many a writer (including this one) from embarrassing moments. Copy editing is one aspect of old media that needs to be a carryover in this new media era. Filed under: Grammar and Media and Technology Comments:
|





Good article. Only a couple days ago I was reading a FoxNews article online and was appalled by the number of typos and errors in grammar that it contained. At least twice while reading, I found myself checking the URL at the top of the browser to verify that I was, indeed, at the FoxNews website and not someone’s personal blog. It was sad.
Comment by Bev — June 23, 2010 @ 11:56 am