|
Posted on 02.21.09 by K. Daniel Glover @ 11:14 pm
I’ve been a critic of Pajamas TV lately, particularly for its bizarre decision to invest its money, brand and reputation in Joe (The Plumber) Wurzelbacher as both a war correspondent and congressional reporter. Here’s one excerpt of a discussion I joined on Facebook recently:
Having taken such a critical interest in PJTV myself, I figured it’s worth continuing to link to what others are saying about the venture, so here are more insights, most of them from an ongoing discussion over at AmSpecBlog: J. Peter Friere: “If conservatives have any hope of regaining political dominance, it will be by converting others to our way of thinking, not by preaching to the choir.” Dave Weigel: “It’s really unforgiveable that an organization with the start-up capital of PJTV isn’t using it to send its cameras out of the studio. Why not hound Rep. John Murtha about his lobbying scandal? Why not show the ‘monkeygate’ New York Post cartoon to actual humans and see if they find it offensive?” Robert Stacy McCain: “The investors wanted more of a virtual-newsroom-set-with-guest-interviews format. Well, maybe you don’t like the talking-head discussion approach that seems to be the basic PJTV model, but what you like or don’t like is much less important than what the investors want.” Filed under: Media and Video Comments:
|



